How Much Money Did Hillary Spend On Her Campaign

WASHINGTON — Republican Donald Trump raised half of what Democrat Hillary Clinton did and still barreled past her to win Tuesday's presidential election.

California billionaire Tom Steyer, who directed more $lx million of his hedge-fund fortune to aid persuade voters to plough out for Democrats, saw Republicans sweep to control of the White Business firm and both chambers of Congress.

The 2022 elections became the latest in a string of volatile federal elections to claiming long-standing notions about the role of money in politics. The 2022 midterm congressional races, for instance, saw upstart Tea Party candidates topple well-funded incumbents around the land as voters grappled with a tough economy and concerns about the Affordable Intendance Act.

Money can aid in a competitive race, but "it can't make up for a body of water change in the views of the electorate," said Fred Malek, a veteran Republican fundraiser who is finance chairman of the Republican Governors Association.

But the 2022 president competition marks the first time since the 1996 showdown betwixt Bob Dole and Bill Clinton showdown in which the president-elect has raised less money than his rival, co-ordinate to a review by the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics.

From the offset, Trump took an unorthodox approach to fundraising.

The real-estate magnate did not start raising money in earnest until late May, and he pumped about $66 meg of his own cash into the contest. When several of his GOP rivals flew to a Southern California resort last year to court bourgeois billionaire Charles Koch and his network of super-rich donors, Trump taunted them on Twitter as "puppets" there to "beg for money."

A nation divided past politics is united by an ballot nighttime shock

In the concluding months of the campaign, Trump collaborated with the Republican National Committee on high-dollar fundraising events, but his long-shot bid as well was fueled by small donors.Contributions of $200 or less accounted for about 64% of his full donations from others. Past contrast, nearly 26% of Clinton's donations through Oct. xix came in amounts that small.

"Nosotros had plenty coin and the right candidate. It's as simple as that," said Lewis Eisenberg, the Republican National Committee's finance chairman.

"Secretary Clinton had all the money, all the Hollywood talent, most of the media and everything else with her. The Usa of America and the citizens of this country are too smart," he said. "Information technology's not a i-chemical element equation. He had the message that was resonating in the country."

Although outside groups helping Clinton far outspent those backing Trump, a pocket-sized cluster of wealthy Republicans did emerge to help in the entrada's last months. Hedge-fund billionaire Robert Mercer, for instance, funded a super PAC that ran digital ads targeting Clinton. Diane Hendricks, Wisconsin'southward richest woman, put millions more into another committee that ran ads attacking Clinton and Democrat Senate contender Russ Feingold in the Badger State.

Both Democrats lost Wisconsin.

Steyer was the Democratic Political party's top super PAC donor as of mid-Oct and sought to mobilize voters who care almost the environment and other liberal issues to vote. In an interview Wednesday, Steyer said he achieved several of his goals, including boosting turnout amongst Millennial voters in parts of key battlefield states.

Steyer is weighing a bid for California governor and pointed to his successes there on Ballot Day, including his assist passing a $2-a-pack cigarette tax.

He said the country'due south most populous country offers "intellectual leadership" for other states. "Nosotros feel yesterday was a strong argument from California of a different style to look at the future than Donald Trump'due south."